<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 526 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327545</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were found to lack substantiating evidence, with the CIT(A) providing reasoned and factual analyses that led to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 526 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327545</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were found to lack substantiating evidence, with the CIT(A) providing reasoned and factual analyses that led to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>