<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 520 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182537</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the society&#039;s eligibility for income tax exemption under section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1998-99. The court found no profit motive in the society&#039;s operations and emphasized its educational objectives, dismissing the Assessing Officer&#039;s denial of exemption based on the surplus declared by the society. The court cited relevant case laws and precedents to support its decision, stating that the society&#039;s past exemptions and educational nature justified the exemption under section 10(22). Penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were not pursued due to the court&#039;s ruling on the exemption issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 18:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 520 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182537</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the society&#039;s eligibility for income tax exemption under section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1998-99. The court found no profit motive in the society&#039;s operations and emphasized its educational objectives, dismissing the Assessing Officer&#039;s denial of exemption based on the surplus declared by the society. The court cited relevant case laws and precedents to support its decision, stating that the society&#039;s past exemptions and educational nature justified the exemption under section 10(22). Penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were not pursued due to the court&#039;s ruling on the exemption issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>