<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 84 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under various sections of the Finance Act against the appellant for consciously suppressing service tax value, indicating mala fides. Although the penalty under Section 78 was reduced, the appeal was ultimately rejected, affirming penalties imposed by lower authorities for failure to register, file returns, and willful evasion of service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 84 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under various sections of the Finance Act against the appellant for consciously suppressing service tax value, indicating mala fides. Although the penalty under Section 78 was reduced, the appeal was ultimately rejected, affirming penalties imposed by lower authorities for failure to register, file returns, and willful evasion of service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>