<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 582 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182526</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the interest income from fixed deposits was not business income, leading to a negative ruling on the deduction of interest paid and received under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act. The Court set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and directed the matter to be reassessed by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 16:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 582 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182526</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the interest income from fixed deposits was not business income, leading to a negative ruling on the deduction of interest paid and received under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act. The Court set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and directed the matter to be reassessed by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>