<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182525</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that interest earned on Fixed Deposit Receipts should be classified as &quot;Income from other sources&quot; and not &quot;Business Income.&quot; The Court held that 100% of the interest should be excluded from business profits under section 80HHC. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude only 90% of the interest was overturned, ruling in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 15:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182525</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that interest earned on Fixed Deposit Receipts should be classified as &quot;Income from other sources&quot; and not &quot;Business Income.&quot; The Court held that 100% of the interest should be excluded from business profits under section 80HHC. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude only 90% of the interest was overturned, ruling in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>