<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 834 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182521</link>
    <description>Reassessment was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer acted only on an audit objection and made no independent determination on the material before him. An audit party&#039;s opinion on a point of law does not amount to information for reopening an assessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As the reopening rested entirely on that audit view, the appellate order setting aside the reassessment was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 15:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 834 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182521</link>
      <description>Reassessment was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer acted only on an audit objection and made no independent determination on the material before him. An audit party&#039;s opinion on a point of law does not amount to information for reopening an assessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As the reopening rested entirely on that audit view, the appellate order setting aside the reassessment was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>