<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 863 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182517</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to reevaluate the property value as on the sale date and 1.4.1981 through the Valuation Cell. The decision emphasized the importance of proper valuation procedures and compliance with statutory provisions under Section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 14:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 863 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182517</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to reevaluate the property value as on the sale date and 1.4.1981 through the Valuation Cell. The decision emphasized the importance of proper valuation procedures and compliance with statutory provisions under Section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>