https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182515 The Bombay HC upheld CESTAT's decision on penalty under the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing that penalty is sustainable even if differential duty is deposited. The court clarified that Section 11AC applies irrespective of suppression of facts, affirming the imposition of penalty in such cases. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2016 14:26:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182515 The Bombay HC upheld CESTAT's decision on penalty under the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing that penalty is sustainable even if differential duty is deposited. The court clarified that Section 11AC applies irrespective of suppression of facts, affirming the imposition of penalty in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182515