<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 890 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182512</link>
    <description>Supplies made to SEZ developers are treated as exports for the purpose of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, so reversal or payment under that rule is not attracted on such clearances. The settled position extended to supplies to SEZ units and SEZ developers/promoters, and the Rule 6(6) exception was applied accordingly. On that basis, the demand under Rule 6 could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 12:47:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 890 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182512</link>
      <description>Supplies made to SEZ developers are treated as exports for the purpose of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, so reversal or payment under that rule is not attracted on such clearances. The settled position extended to supplies to SEZ units and SEZ developers/promoters, and the Rule 6(6) exception was applied accordingly. On that basis, the demand under Rule 6 could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>