https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182505 In fiscal matters, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be exercised where the VAT statute provides an effective appellate and revisional remedy. The recognised exceptions remain limited to cases of breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or enforcement of fundamental rights. As the challenge to the penalty notice and excess input tax credit finding could be examined by the statutory forum, the High Court declined to go into the merits at the writ stage and directed the assessee to pursue the statutory remedy instead. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2016 11:56:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182505 In fiscal matters, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be exercised where the VAT statute provides an effective appellate and revisional remedy. The recognised exceptions remain limited to cases of breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or enforcement of fundamental rights. As the challenge to the penalty notice and excess input tax credit finding could be examined by the statutory forum, the High Court declined to go into the merits at the writ stage and directed the assessee to pursue the statutory remedy instead. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182505