https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182503 A penal reversion made without the requisite disciplinary process is void, and an order keeping the post in abeyance cannot validate such action; the civil servant was therefore entitled to be treated as continuing in the post of Office Superintendent. The claim for arrears of salary, however, fell under Article 102 of the Limitation Act, 1908, so recovery was restricted to amounts accruing within the statutory three-year period before suit. The Court declined to depart from the settled view on limitation and modified the decree accordingly. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2016 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182503 A penal reversion made without the requisite disciplinary process is void, and an order keeping the post in abeyance cannot validate such action; the civil servant was therefore entitled to be treated as continuing in the post of Office Superintendent. The claim for arrears of salary, however, fell under Article 102 of the Limitation Act, 1908, so recovery was restricted to amounts accruing within the statutory three-year period before suit. The Court declined to depart from the settled view on limitation and modified the decree accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182503