https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3443 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal filed by an electrical contractor against the demand for service tax under consulting engineer and commissioning installation services. The Tribunal held that the appellant, not being a qualified engineer, was not liable for service tax during the relevant period. Services related to erection of an 11 KV Transformer were also found non-taxable until a specific date. The demand for services from 1-7-2003 to 31-3-2004 was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3443 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal filed by an electrical contractor against the demand for service tax under consulting engineer and commissioning installation services. The Tribunal held that the appellant, not being a qualified engineer, was not liable for service tax during the relevant period. Services related to erection of an 11 KV Transformer were also found non-taxable until a specific date. The demand for services from 1-7-2003 to 31-3-2004 was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3443