<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 137 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a State Government Department, holding that their sovereign functions were exempt from Service Tax. The appellant&#039;s bonafide belief in non-coverage under the Finance Act was accepted, granting them relief based on legal interpretations and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized that activities performed as statutory obligations by State Government entities were not subject to Service Tax, referencing circulars and judgments supporting their stance. The appellant successfully argued against the allegation of suppression of value of taxable services, with the Tribunal reinforcing the exemption from Service Tax for entities engaged in sovereign activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 137 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a State Government Department, holding that their sovereign functions were exempt from Service Tax. The appellant&#039;s bonafide belief in non-coverage under the Finance Act was accepted, granting them relief based on legal interpretations and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized that activities performed as statutory obligations by State Government entities were not subject to Service Tax, referencing circulars and judgments supporting their stance. The appellant successfully argued against the allegation of suppression of value of taxable services, with the Tribunal reinforcing the exemption from Service Tax for entities engaged in sovereign activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>