<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Confirms Additions: Secret Commissions to Client Employees Not Deductible u/s 37(1) Due to Lack of Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29208</link>
    <description>Addition made on account of payment of “Mehta Sukhadi” - According to the appellant, such commission has been paid secretly to employees of numerous clients and those amounts are deductible under Section 37(1) - Assessee failed to prove the commission paid - additions confirmed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 01:23:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 01:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Confirms Additions: Secret Commissions to Client Employees Not Deductible u/s 37(1) Due to Lack of Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29208</link>
      <description>Addition made on account of payment of “Mehta Sukhadi” - According to the appellant, such commission has been paid secretly to employees of numerous clients and those amounts are deductible under Section 37(1) - Assessee failed to prove the commission paid - additions confirmed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 01:23:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>