https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3439 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, allowed the appeals challenging the demand of service tax on Business Auxiliary Service for the periods in question. The Tribunal held that the reimbursements received by the appellants were not subject to service tax, leading to the conclusion that the demand of differential service tax could not be sustained. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and both appeals were allowed, including the disposal of the stay application. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3439 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, allowed the appeals challenging the demand of service tax on Business Auxiliary Service for the periods in question. The Tribunal held that the reimbursements received by the appellants were not subject to service tax, leading to the conclusion that the demand of differential service tax could not be sustained. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and both appeals were allowed, including the disposal of the stay application. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3439