https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327532 A writ petition that challenges only a consequential order is not maintainable when the foundational original order is left unassailed. Here, the liability flowed from an earlier order, and the petitioner sought to quash only the later consequential order without questioning the original determination. The court noted that the petitioner also failed to produce proof of payment despite repeated reminders. Because the original order remained intact, the consequential order could not be independently attacked, and the writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable. en-us Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2016 01:26:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327532 A writ petition that challenges only a consequential order is not maintainable when the foundational original order is left unassailed. Here, the liability flowed from an earlier order, and the petitioner sought to quash only the later consequential order without questioning the original determination. The court noted that the petitioner also failed to produce proof of payment despite repeated reminders. Because the original order remained intact, the consequential order could not be independently attacked, and the writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327532