<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 506 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327525</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Commissioner/Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration on issues including costing determination, limitation period, assessable value, and estoppel applicability. The Court emphasized the importance of reevaluating the case based on specific directions provided, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the legal and factual aspects involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 22:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 506 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327525</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Commissioner/Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration on issues including costing determination, limitation period, assessable value, and estoppel applicability. The Court emphasized the importance of reevaluating the case based on specific directions provided, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the legal and factual aspects involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>