https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327524 Conviction under the NDPS Act was sustained because the prosecution's documentary and ocular evidence, including seizure material and witness testimony, was found credible and sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appellants could not show any material error in that appreciation of evidence, and their bare denial in Section 313 CrPC statements did not displace the prosecution case. The Supreme Court also noted that the sentence imposed was the statutory minimum, and upheld the conviction and sentence while dismissing the appeals. en-us Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327524 Conviction under the NDPS Act was sustained because the prosecution's documentary and ocular evidence, including seizure material and witness testimony, was found credible and sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appellants could not show any material error in that appreciation of evidence, and their bare denial in Section 313 CrPC statements did not displace the prosecution case. The Supreme Court also noted that the sentence imposed was the statutory minimum, and upheld the conviction and sentence while dismissing the appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327524