<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 495 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327514</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement for the amalgamation of two companies after compliance with statutory requirements, preservation of records, and payment of costs. The Regional Director and Official Liquidator did not raise material objections, and the petitioner companies committed to fulfilling all observations and statutory obligations. The court emphasized compliance with the Companies Act provisions, preservation of records, and statutory liabilities, directing the petitioners to pay costs and ensuring prompt action by relevant authorities. The petitions were disposed of in accordance with the court&#039;s orders and statutory compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 01:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 495 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327514</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement for the amalgamation of two companies after compliance with statutory requirements, preservation of records, and payment of costs. The Regional Director and Official Liquidator did not raise material objections, and the petitioner companies committed to fulfilling all observations and statutory obligations. The court emphasized compliance with the Companies Act provisions, preservation of records, and statutory liabilities, directing the petitioners to pay costs and ensuring prompt action by relevant authorities. The petitions were disposed of in accordance with the court&#039;s orders and statutory compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>