<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327510</link>
    <description>The court quashed the transfer orders transferring the petitioners&#039; income tax cases from Wardha and Nagpur to Jodhpur, citing non-compliance with statutory provisions and procedural requirements under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found the orders lacked sufficient reasons, were issued by an improper authority, and did not meet procedural standards, rendering them arbitrary and illegal. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned orders and made the rule absolute, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327510</link>
      <description>The court quashed the transfer orders transferring the petitioners&#039; income tax cases from Wardha and Nagpur to Jodhpur, citing non-compliance with statutory provisions and procedural requirements under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found the orders lacked sufficient reasons, were issued by an improper authority, and did not meet procedural standards, rendering them arbitrary and illegal. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned orders and made the rule absolute, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>