<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 482 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327501</link>
    <description>A transfer described as a &quot;gift&quot; was treated as revocable at the donor&#039;s instance, and the recipient later repaid the amount after revocation notices. Read as a whole, the document showed no absolute transfer of ownership, so the receipt was characterised as a temporary arrangement rather than a completed gift or unexplained income. On that basis, taxation under section 56(2)(v) was not sustainable and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 01:23:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 482 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327501</link>
      <description>A transfer described as a &quot;gift&quot; was treated as revocable at the donor&#039;s instance, and the recipient later repaid the amount after revocation notices. Read as a whole, the document showed no absolute transfer of ownership, so the receipt was characterised as a temporary arrangement rather than a completed gift or unexplained income. On that basis, taxation under section 56(2)(v) was not sustainable and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>