<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 481 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decisions. The disallowances under sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia) were overturned, along with the addition for unexplained gold deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of actual transactions and the accurate reflection of liabilities in the books of accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 22:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 481 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, reversing the lower authorities&#039; decisions. The disallowances under sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia) were overturned, along with the addition for unexplained gold deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of actual transactions and the accurate reflection of liabilities in the books of accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>