<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 478 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327497</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the disallowance of expenditure on discount and interest on borrowing through commercial papers and NCDs for the assessment year 2008-09 was unwarranted. The Court found that all funds were utilized for business purposes after a merger, and there was no restructuring or share purchase in that year. The Tribunal and the Commissioner were deemed correct in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 478 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327497</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the disallowance of expenditure on discount and interest on borrowing through commercial papers and NCDs for the assessment year 2008-09 was unwarranted. The Court found that all funds were utilized for business purposes after a merger, and there was no restructuring or share purchase in that year. The Tribunal and the Commissioner were deemed correct in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>