<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 476 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327495</link>
    <description>The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the interest payment made towards the purchase of debentures was allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) as the debentures were considered business assets rather than investments. The Court affirmed the findings of the CIT (A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal and directing each party to bear their costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 01:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 476 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327495</link>
      <description>The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the interest payment made towards the purchase of debentures was allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) as the debentures were considered business assets rather than investments. The Court affirmed the findings of the CIT (A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal and directing each party to bear their costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>