<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 475 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327494</link>
    <description>The court found that the reassessment notices issued under Section 148 for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were invalid as they did not comply with the jurisdictional preconditions required under the first proviso to Section 147. The reasons recorded for reopening the assessment did not disclose any material fact that the petitioners failed to fully or truly disclose. Consequently, the court set aside the notices, ruling that there was no basis to believe that any income had escaped assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 475 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327494</link>
      <description>The court found that the reassessment notices issued under Section 148 for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were invalid as they did not comply with the jurisdictional preconditions required under the first proviso to Section 147. The reasons recorded for reopening the assessment did not disclose any material fact that the petitioners failed to fully or truly disclose. Consequently, the court set aside the notices, ruling that there was no basis to believe that any income had escaped assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>