<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 465 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under Section 147 within the time limit. However, the disallowance of interest expenses on Kotak Term Loans was deemed unjustified as the assessee had adequate interest-free funds available. Consequently, the addition for disallowance of interest expenses was deleted, resulting in the appeal being partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 01:21:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 465 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under Section 147 within the time limit. However, the disallowance of interest expenses on Kotak Term Loans was deemed unjustified as the assessee had adequate interest-free funds available. Consequently, the addition for disallowance of interest expenses was deleted, resulting in the appeal being partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>