<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1280 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182476</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the imported goods were covered under Section 123 of the Customs Act, rendering the applicant ineligible to seek settlement under Section 127B. The court disagreed with a prior decision and emphasized that goods falling under Section 123 are excluded from the Settlement Commission&#039;s jurisdiction. As a result, the application for settlement was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 23:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1280 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182476</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the imported goods were covered under Section 123 of the Customs Act, rendering the applicant ineligible to seek settlement under Section 127B. The court disagreed with a prior decision and emphasized that goods falling under Section 123 are excluded from the Settlement Commission&#039;s jurisdiction. As a result, the application for settlement was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>