<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1427 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, based on audit objections pointing out factual errors. The disallowance of prior period expenses under section 37(1) of the Act was maintained due to the lack of evidence proving that the liability crystallized in the year under consideration. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 23:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1427 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, based on audit objections pointing out factual errors. The disallowance of prior period expenses under section 37(1) of the Act was maintained due to the lack of evidence proving that the liability crystallized in the year under consideration. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>