<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3431</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent for service tax on the sale of SIM cards. The Court considered the uncertainty surrounding the taxability of SIM card sales due to conflicting judgments and pending issues before the Supreme Court. Given the lack of clarity and doubt regarding the service tax levy on SIM card sales, the Court found the penalty unjustified and dismissed the appeal, concluding that no substantial question of law arose from the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3431</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent for service tax on the sale of SIM cards. The Court considered the uncertainty surrounding the taxability of SIM card sales due to conflicting judgments and pending issues before the Supreme Court. Given the lack of clarity and doubt regarding the service tax levy on SIM card sales, the Court found the penalty unjustified and dismissed the appeal, concluding that no substantial question of law arose from the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>