<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182460</link>
    <description>The reassessment u/s 147 for non-declaration of capital gain on the sale of agricultural land was deemed valid as the original assessment under u/s 143(1)(a) did not amount to a change of opinion. The denial of deduction u/s 54B for the HUF was overturned by the Tribunal, holding that section 54B does not restrict the deduction to specific types of assessees, unlike section 54. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction to the HUF as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 12:23:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182460</link>
      <description>The reassessment u/s 147 for non-declaration of capital gain on the sale of agricultural land was deemed valid as the original assessment under u/s 143(1)(a) did not amount to a change of opinion. The denial of deduction u/s 54B for the HUF was overturned by the Tribunal, holding that section 54B does not restrict the deduction to specific types of assessees, unlike section 54. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction to the HUF as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>