<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 447 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327466</link>
    <description>Deliberate under-valuation of goods cleared for home consumption was upheld on the basis of the appellant&#039;s own resolution and the concurrent factual findings of the assessing authority and Tribunal. The record supported the conclusion that the goods had been intentionally under-valued, and the differential amount had already been paid after detection. As no ground was shown to disturb those findings, the penalty was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 447 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327466</link>
      <description>Deliberate under-valuation of goods cleared for home consumption was upheld on the basis of the appellant&#039;s own resolution and the concurrent factual findings of the assessing authority and Tribunal. The record supported the conclusion that the goods had been intentionally under-valued, and the differential amount had already been paid after detection. As no ground was shown to disturb those findings, the penalty was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>