<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 440 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327459</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitions, directing the Respondents to process the Petitioners&#039; claims for duty drawback in accordance with the law. The Court invalidated the executive directions and public notices that sought to deny the duty drawback benefits to the Petitioners, emphasizing that statutory notifications cannot be amended or diluted by such means.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 440 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327459</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitions, directing the Respondents to process the Petitioners&#039; claims for duty drawback in accordance with the law. The Court invalidated the executive directions and public notices that sought to deny the duty drawback benefits to the Petitioners, emphasizing that statutory notifications cannot be amended or diluted by such means.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>