<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 439 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling that the refund of redemption fines and penalties should be granted to the importers who paid them, not to the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that penal liabilities cannot be transferred, and refunds must align with statutory provisions. The appeal was rejected, affirming that refunds are to be given to the party bearing the financial burden according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 11:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 439 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling that the refund of redemption fines and penalties should be granted to the importers who paid them, not to the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that penal liabilities cannot be transferred, and refunds must align with statutory provisions. The appeal was rejected, affirming that refunds are to be given to the party bearing the financial burden according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>