https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327451 The former CPIO was directed by the Central Information Commission to explain non-compliance with an RTI application response. The Commission adjourned the penalty hearing for the former CPIO to provide written submissions. Subsequently, the former CPIO clarified that another officer should have responded and explained RTI-related issues during his tenure. Satisfied with his compliance, the Commission dropped the penalty proceedings and directed the public authority to assist him. No disciplinary action was recommended, and the complaint was closed after the required information was provided to the complainant, who was satisfied with the response. en-us Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 May 2016 11:45:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327451 The former CPIO was directed by the Central Information Commission to explain non-compliance with an RTI application response. The Commission adjourned the penalty hearing for the former CPIO to provide written submissions. Subsequently, the former CPIO clarified that another officer should have responded and explained RTI-related issues during his tenure. Satisfied with his compliance, the Commission dropped the penalty proceedings and directed the public authority to assist him. No disciplinary action was recommended, and the complaint was closed after the required information was provided to the complainant, who was satisfied with the response. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327451