<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327436</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to invoke jurisdiction under section 263 of the IT Act, remanding the issue of prior period expenses to the Assessing Officer for proper examination. The appeal challenging the revision order was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity for thorough inquiry and verification in tax assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 10:41:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327436</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to invoke jurisdiction under section 263 of the IT Act, remanding the issue of prior period expenses to the Assessing Officer for proper examination. The appeal challenging the revision order was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity for thorough inquiry and verification in tax assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>