<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 395 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327414</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, despite substantive tax issues on deductions under sections 80HHC and 80IB, and transfer pricing adjustments under Section 92CA. The judgment underscores the importance of territorial jurisdiction in tax matters and upholds principles governing case allocation based on the location of the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 395 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327414</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, despite substantive tax issues on deductions under sections 80HHC and 80IB, and transfer pricing adjustments under Section 92CA. The judgment underscores the importance of territorial jurisdiction in tax matters and upholds principles governing case allocation based on the location of the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>