<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Applicant&#039;s Expansion Plan for Haridwar Plant II Valid as Existing Unit Despite Separate Licenses and Codes, Says Revenue.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29150</link>
    <description>Area Based exemption - expansion of unit - the contention of Revenue that the applicant proposes to take separate factory license, ESI No. and PF Codes for expanded Haridwar Plant II, therefore, it will not fall under the category of existing unit, is not correct - AAR</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 11:33:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 18:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Applicant&#039;s Expansion Plan for Haridwar Plant II Valid as Existing Unit Despite Separate Licenses and Codes, Says Revenue.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29150</link>
      <description>Area Based exemption - expansion of unit - the contention of Revenue that the applicant proposes to take separate factory license, ESI No. and PF Codes for expanded Haridwar Plant II, therefore, it will not fall under the category of existing unit, is not correct - AAR</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 11:33:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>