https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327410 The HC declined to issue a mandamus for immediate release of the imported goods and did not examine the substantive dispute against the impugned notification at that stage. Instead, it granted liberty to the petitioner to file one more representation, directed the authority to consider the earlier and proposed representations in accordance with law, and required a personal hearing before passing orders. The matter was thus left for fresh administrative determination, with the merits expressly kept open. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 May 2016 11:34:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327410 The HC declined to issue a mandamus for immediate release of the imported goods and did not examine the substantive dispute against the impugned notification at that stage. Instead, it granted liberty to the petitioner to file one more representation, directed the authority to consider the earlier and proposed representations in accordance with law, and required a personal hearing before passing orders. The matter was thus left for fresh administrative determination, with the merits expressly kept open. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327410