https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327403 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not maintainable against SARFAESI recovery measures once the secured creditor has proceeded beyond section 13(4) and invoked section 14 for physical possession, because an efficacious statutory remedy lies under section 17 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The rule of self-restraint requires the aggrieved party to pursue that statutory appeal in preference to a writ petition in recovery matters. The writ petition was therefore dismissed, with the petitioners left to avail the remedy under section 17. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 May 2016 11:33:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327403 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not maintainable against SARFAESI recovery measures once the secured creditor has proceeded beyond section 13(4) and invoked section 14 for physical possession, because an efficacious statutory remedy lies under section 17 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The rule of self-restraint requires the aggrieved party to pursue that statutory appeal in preference to a writ petition in recovery matters. The writ petition was therefore dismissed, with the petitioners left to avail the remedy under section 17. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327403