<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 362 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the lack of valid grounds for reassessment and the impermissibility of reviewing the applicability of section 10BA. The judgment emphasized the necessity of tangible material for reopening assessments and rejected the notion of a change of opinion as a valid basis for such actions. The Tribunal found the reassessment to be impermissible, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 11:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 362 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the lack of valid grounds for reassessment and the impermissibility of reviewing the applicability of section 10BA. The judgment emphasized the necessity of tangible material for reopening assessments and rejected the notion of a change of opinion as a valid basis for such actions. The Tribunal found the reassessment to be impermissible, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>