<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 346 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of undisclosed cash and the consequent interest charge under Section 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s reasonable explanation supported by evidence regarding the source of the cash received from the mother and the closure of the business after the father&#039;s demise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 23:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 346 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of undisclosed cash and the consequent interest charge under Section 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s reasonable explanation supported by evidence regarding the source of the cash received from the mother and the closure of the business after the father&#039;s demise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>