https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182405 The Departmental appeals were dismissed, and the assessee's appeals were partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the rectification of the CIT(A)'s original order, confirmed the treatment of certain reimbursements and expenses as perquisites, and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80-O and to recalculate interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 220(2). en-us Mon, 29 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2016 18:53:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182405 The Departmental appeals were dismissed, and the assessee's appeals were partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the rectification of the CIT(A)'s original order, confirmed the treatment of certain reimbursements and expenses as perquisites, and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80-O and to recalculate interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 220(2). Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 29 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182405