<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1195 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing product development expenses under section 37(1) as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 2002-03. The expenses were deemed to relate to the existing business and not for setting up a new line of business. Regarding depreciation recomputation, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to consider the disallowed amount from the previous year, resulting in partial allowance of the assessee&#039;s claim. The assessment&#039;s reopening under section 147 was deemed unnecessary after correcting the depreciation value, leading to the dismissal of both parties&#039; appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 17:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1195 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing product development expenses under section 37(1) as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 2002-03. The expenses were deemed to relate to the existing business and not for setting up a new line of business. Regarding depreciation recomputation, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to consider the disallowed amount from the previous year, resulting in partial allowance of the assessee&#039;s claim. The assessment&#039;s reopening under section 147 was deemed unnecessary after correcting the depreciation value, leading to the dismissal of both parties&#039; appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>