<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 111 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3402</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the rectification of assessment under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to rectify the assessment under Sec.154 as the issue of Sec.44AE application was debatable. The Court emphasized that rectification is for correcting obvious mistakes on the face of the record and dismissed the tax case without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 111 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3402</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the rectification of assessment under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to rectify the assessment under Sec.154 as the issue of Sec.44AE application was debatable. The Court emphasized that rectification is for correcting obvious mistakes on the face of the record and dismissed the tax case without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>