https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182385 The appeal was dismissed against the duty demand confirmation of Rs. 3,06,65,035/- along with interest and penalty, as the appellant falsely claimed the duty had been recovered. Despite seeking waiver of pre-deposit, it was revealed the appellant had only deposited a fraction of the demanded amount. The Tribunal, noting the misleading information provided, recalled the stay order and dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to legal provisions and the repercussions of providing false information to the Tribunal in matters concerning duty demand and penalties. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2016 11:58:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182385 The appeal was dismissed against the duty demand confirmation of Rs. 3,06,65,035/- along with interest and penalty, as the appellant falsely claimed the duty had been recovered. Despite seeking waiver of pre-deposit, it was revealed the appellant had only deposited a fraction of the demanded amount. The Tribunal, noting the misleading information provided, recalled the stay order and dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to legal provisions and the repercussions of providing false information to the Tribunal in matters concerning duty demand and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182385