https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182379 Land acquisition for an integrated infrastructure project implemented through a State instrumentality was treated as serving a broad public purpose and could proceed under Part II of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 rather than Part VII. The Court held that the project must be viewed as a whole, and the mere involvement of a private enterprise did not convert the acquisition into one for a company simpliciter. It also held that the urgency and Section 5A objections did not vitiate the proceedings on the facts, since the later notice-and-objection process was undertaken. No mala fides, colourable exercise of power, or fraud on the statute was found. en-us Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182379 Land acquisition for an integrated infrastructure project implemented through a State instrumentality was treated as serving a broad public purpose and could proceed under Part II of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 rather than Part VII. The Court held that the project must be viewed as a whole, and the mere involvement of a private enterprise did not convert the acquisition into one for a company simpliciter. It also held that the urgency and Section 5A objections did not vitiate the proceedings on the facts, since the later notice-and-objection process was undertaken. No mala fides, colourable exercise of power, or fraud on the statute was found. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182379