<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 337 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327356</link>
    <description>Entitlement to reward claims under CBDT guidelines was to be processed through departmental investigation and verification, with the revenue undertaking to examine the petitioners&#039; aggregate claims and dispose of them within six months. The Court accepted that statement and, as no substantive controversy remained for adjudication, directed compliance with the stipulated administrative process. The petitions were disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 337 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327356</link>
      <description>Entitlement to reward claims under CBDT guidelines was to be processed through departmental investigation and verification, with the revenue undertaking to examine the petitioners&#039; aggregate claims and dispose of them within six months. The Court accepted that statement and, as no substantive controversy remained for adjudication, directed compliance with the stipulated administrative process. The petitions were disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>