<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 335 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327354</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing a recomputation of the penalty by excluding Rs. 20,000 from each deposit. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to the tax effect being below Rs. 10 lakhs, in line with the CBDT circular. The judgment stressed adherence to statutory provisions and consideration of precedents and circulars in penalty computations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 335 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327354</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing a recomputation of the penalty by excluding Rs. 20,000 from each deposit. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to the tax effect being below Rs. 10 lakhs, in line with the CBDT circular. The judgment stressed adherence to statutory provisions and consideration of precedents and circulars in penalty computations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>