<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 109 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3395</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification order under Section 154, aligning with Supreme Court interpretations, regarding the deduction under Section 80 IA based on unabsorbed losses. The Court emphasized rectification for apparent mistakes, not debatable legal points, dismissing the appeal as no substantial questions of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 109 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3395</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification order under Section 154, aligning with Supreme Court interpretations, regarding the deduction under Section 80 IA based on unabsorbed losses. The Court emphasized rectification for apparent mistakes, not debatable legal points, dismissing the appeal as no substantial questions of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>