<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327344</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions on account of interest income and unexplained cash credit. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) appropriately considered the evidence presented by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327344</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions on account of interest income and unexplained cash credit. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) appropriately considered the evidence presented by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>